Abstract
The paper examines the prospect of generating obligations for states parties to the American Convention on Human Rights, hereinafter ACHR, control of conventionality Inter American Court of Human Rights, hereinafter IACHR has demanded exercising national jurisdiction over domestic law in contravention of the corpus iuris of inter-American, which is analyzed in its practical implications for ordinary and constitutional jurisdictions in general. It also reflects on the differences between constitutional control and control of conventionality.