More than twenty years ago, Easterbrook and Fischel made a famous harsh criticism of the simplistic way in which the legislation applicable to the corporate governance of a company is often analyzed. The selection of his darts was not accidental, the generalization of an approach whose premise assumed that the board of a company always uses its position of power to exploit investors and consumers, threatened to overthrow the conceptual balance on which success rests. of any regulation on business organizations.
Pardow Lorenzo, D., & Vallejo Garretón, R. (2014). Oversight and transparency in State companies: Is more synonymous with better?. Revista De Derecho Público, (71), Págs. 220–240. https://doi.org/10.5354/rdpu.v0i71.35694