The trust in the virtues of the constitutional judge and the aporia of judicial self restraint principles

Authors

Abstract

The problem of the limitation of the power of the constitutional judges has been mainly approached in a perspective that this article proposes to denominate as of «confidence in the virtues». Within this approach, three versions are identified: the one that offers a model of an ideal constitutional judge; the one that develops interpretive tools for the constitutional adjudication; and the one that proposes to focus on the personal virtue of the constitutional judge. This paper argues that the approach described is relevant to the self-understanding of constitutional judges and interpretation, but as a mechanism designed to limit power is insufficient. Concludes that effective control of the power of the constitutional judge will necessarily rely on institutional arrangements.

Keywords:

judicial self-restraint, deference, presumption of constitutionality, judicial virtue, political questions